The Right to Say No

Indeed, this a right everyone should no. Very little can be gained from being initially overly cooperative with the state (eventual cooperation, with a defined benefit, can be helpful later).  This is a hard fact for some people to comprehend, especially after a series of empty promises from a smooth talking detective who you now may believe is your friend.

If you have ever watched Law & Order (or Law & Order: SVU, which I personally prefer), you may know more about the operation of the criminal justice system than you realize. A lot of it is dramatized, to be sure. However, there are some kernels of truth to be learned. One is, the police are allowed to use dishonest tactics to extract information.

For instance, remember any episodes where Olivia Bentsen claims to have an eyewitness, or DNA, or something that would connect the “perp” to the crime they are investigating? And it wasn’t true?

That is allowable. In fact, it often works. Look at it this way.

If the state had a good case against you, they wouldn’t need to obtain a confession. If they are talking to you, it means they are short on information. In fact, it is likely they can only detain you based on the information you provide them.

The best thing anyone accused of a crime can do it say nothing. Well, say nothing – then call your lawyer.

Bookmark and Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.